Phytochemical Profiling And Antioxidant Potential Of Calendula Officinalis: A Pharmacognostic And Biotechnological Perspective

Authors

  • Vashvi Kumar Sahu Kamla Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (KIPS), Shri Shankaracharya Professional University (SSPU), Junwani, Bhilai – 490020, Chhattisgarh, India Author
    Competing Interests

    Authors declared that there is no conflicts of interests exists.

  • Vicky Soni Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research (SSIPSR), Shri Shankaracharya Professional University (SSPU), Junwani, Bhilai – 490020, Chhattisgarh, India. Author
    Competing Interests

    Authors declared that there is no conflicts of interests exists.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66220/3zancg55

Keywords:

Calendula officinalis, Pot Marigold, Pharmacognosy, Phytochemical Profiling, Antioxidant Potential, Plant Biotechnology, Quality Control, Herbal Drug Development

Abstract

Calendula officinalis L. (Pot Marigold), a medicinal plant belonging to the family Asteraceae, has been widely used in traditional medicine because of its diverse therapeutic properties. Owing to its rich phytochemical composition and broad pharmacological potential, it has attracted increasing attention in herbal drug development, nutraceuticals, cosmeceuticals, and pharmaceutical biotechnology. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pharmacognostic characteristics, phytochemical profile, antioxidant potential, and biotechnological significance of C. officinalis. Relevant published literature on the pharmacognosy, phytochemistry, antioxidant activity, and medicinal plant biotechnology of C. officinalis was critically reviewed and synthesized. Information on pharmacognostic evaluation, phytochemical characterization, in vitro antioxidant assays, and biotechnological approaches was compiled and analyzed. The review indicates that C. officinalis is rich in flavonoids, phenolic compounds, carotenoids, triterpenoids, essential oils, and other bioactive metabolites responsible for its therapeutic activities. Antioxidant potential has been consistently demonstrated through assays such as DPPH radical scavenging, total phenolic content (TPC), and total flavonoid content (TFC), highlighting its ability to scavenge free radicals and regulate oxidative stress. Furthermore, pharmacognostic evaluation supports its authentication and quality assessment, while advances in plant tissue culture, metabolic engineering, and bioactive compound optimization enhance its sustainable utilization. Calendula officinalis represents a valuable natural source of antioxidants and bioactive compounds with significant potential for modern healthcare applications. Integrating pharmacognostic evaluation with biotechnological innovations can facilitate the development of standardized, effective, and sustainable herbal formulations while supporting future pharmaceutical and therapeutic applications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Atanasov AG, Zotchev SB, Dirsch VM, Supuran CT. Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(3):200-16. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z.

2. Efstratiou E, Hussain AI, Nigam PS, Moore JE, Ayub MA, Rao JR. Antimicrobial activity of Calendula officinalis petal extracts against fungi, as well as Gram-negative and Gram-positive clinical pathogens. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2012;18(3):173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2012.02.003.

3. Arora D, Rani A, Sharma A. A review on phytochemistry and ethnopharmacological aspects of Calendula officinalis. Pharmacogn Rev. 2013;7(14):179-87. doi: 10.4103/0973-7847.120520.

4. Miguel MG. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils: a short review. Molecules. 2010;15(12):9252-87. doi: 10.3390/molecules15129252.

5. Ramawat KG, Merillon JM. Biotechnology of Medicinal Plants: Vitalizer and Therapeutic Applications. Science Publishers; 2007.

6. Pommier P, Gomez F, Sunyach MP, et al. Phase III randomized trial of Calendula officinalis compared with trolamine for prevention of acute dermatitis during irradiation. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(8):1447-53. doi: 10.1200/jco.2004.07.063.

7. Muley BP, Khadabadi SS, Banarase NB. Phytochemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Calendula officinalis: A review. Trop J Pharm Res. 2009;8(5):455-65. doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v8i5.48090.

8. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999;299:152-78. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1.

9. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999;64(4):555-9. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2.

10. Ukiya M, Akihisa T, Yasukawa K, et al. Anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor-promoting, and cytotoxic activities of constituents of Calendula officinalis flowers. J Nat Prod. 2006;69(12):1692-6. doi: 10.1021/np068016b.

11. Neukirch H, D’Ambrosio M, Sosa S, Altinier G, Della Loggia R, Guerriero A. Improved anti-inflammatory activity of three new terpenoids derived, by systematic chemical modifications, from the abundant triterpenes of the flowery plant Calendula officinalis. Chem Biodivers. 2005;2(5):657-71. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200590042.

12. Gazim ZC, Rezende CM, Fraga SR, Svidzinski TIE, Cortez DAG. Antifungal activity of the essential oil from Calendula officinalis L. (Asteraceae) growing in Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2008;39(1):61-3. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838220080001000015.

13. Halliwell B. Free radicals and antioxidants: updating a personal view. Nutr Rev. 2012;70(5):257-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00476.x.

14. Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, Paganga G. Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;20(7):933-56. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9.

15. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci Technol. 1995;28(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5.

16. Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(10):4290-302. doi: 10.1021/jf0502698.

17. Della Loggia R, Tubaro A, Sosa S, et al. The role of flavonoids and triterpenoids in the anti-inflammatory activity of Calendula officinalis. Fitoterapia. 1994;65:475-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-959562.

18. Evans WC. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy. 16th ed. Elsevier; 2009. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-2933-2.X0001-9.

19. World Health Organization. Quality Control Methods for Herbal Materials. WHO Press; 2011.

20. Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15(3):473-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.

21. Verpoorte R, Contin A, Memelink J. Biotechnology for the production of plant secondary metabolites. Phytochem Rev. 2002;1(1):13-25. doi: 10.1023/A:1015871916833.

22. Joshi K, Chavan P, Warude D, Patwardhan B. Molecular markers in herbal drug technology. Curr Sci. 2004;87(2):159-65.

23. Rates SMK. Plants as source of drugs. Toxicon. 2001;39(5):603-13. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(00)00154-9.

24. Ekor M. The growing use of herbal medicines: issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front Pharmacol. 2014;4:177. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00177.

25. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Good Agricultural and Collection Practices (GACP) for Medicinal Plants. Geneva: WHO; 2003.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

Phytochemical Profiling And Antioxidant Potential Of Calendula Officinalis: A Pharmacognostic And Biotechnological Perspective. (2026). Journal of PhytoPharmaceutical and Advanced Chemistry, 1(03), 168-177. https://doi.org/10.66220/3zancg55

Similar Articles

11-13 of 13

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.